IVV vs TJUL

IVV vs TJUL

Which is better, IVV or TJUL?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTJUL
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$115M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50810
YTD Return+12.39%Best+3.29%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+4.37%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+7.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.8%3.4%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-4.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.2 years$17,580Best$12,310
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 18, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 18, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.2 years).

IVV vs TJUL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.

IVV vs TJUL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to July 2027 (TJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TJUL returned +4.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 3.29% for TJUL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +7.40% for TJUL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 3.4% for TJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -4.6% for TJUL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TJUL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TJUL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and TJUL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVTJUL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TJUL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TJUL charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or TJUL?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +4.37% for TJUL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or TJUL?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 3.4% for TJUL. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TJUL -4.6%.

Should I hold both IVV and TJUL?

IVV and TJUL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TJUL?

IVV yields 1.06% while TJUL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TJUL better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.