IVV vs TJUN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | -0.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +8.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -9.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 20, 2025 |
IVV vs TJUN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while TJUN returned +8.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a loss of 0.27% for TJUN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.0% for TJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -9.8% for TJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TJUN charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TJUN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TJUN share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TJUN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TJUN charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TJUN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +8.46% for TJUN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +10.89% for TJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TJUN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.0% for TJUN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TJUN -9.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and TJUN?
IVV and TJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TJUN?
IVV and TJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TJUN?
IVV yields 1.09% while TJUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.