IVV vs TKNZ

IVV vs TKNZ

Which is better, IVV or TKNZ?

We do not have enough on IVV and TKNZ to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTKNZ
Expense Ratio0.03%-
AUM$876.4B$21M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50810
YTD Return+12.51%+24.11%Best
1Y Return+17.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.95%-
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)T.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulticurrency
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 15, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

IVV vs TKNZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs TKNZ Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF (TKNZ) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 24.11% for TKNZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and TKNZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVTKNZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TKNZ?

IVV yields 1.06% while TKNZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TKNZ better than IVV?

We hold very little data on IVV and TKNZ, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.