IVV vs TNA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF
Which is better, IVV or TNA?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, TNA over 1Y and 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TNA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.31% |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +11.51% | +34.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.96% | +43.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.01% | +27.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.66%Best | -5.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 60.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -88.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,149Best | $7,485 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 5, 2008 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 5, 2008 to Sep 15, 2026 (17.9 years).
IVV vs TNA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TNA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF (TNA) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% while TNA returned +43.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a gain of 34.02% for TNA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.01% per year against +27.01% for TNA; over five years the annualized figures are +12.66% and -5.63% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.78% annualized vs +9.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.5% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -88.2% for TNA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TNA charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.31% for TNA.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 4 in TNA, totalling 99.3% and 91.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 4 in TNA, against full books of 508 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and TNA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TNA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TNA charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TNA?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.96% vs +43.78% for TNA, so TNA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), IVV annualized +12.78% vs +9.70% for TNA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TNA?
TNA has been the more volatile fund at 60.5% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs TNA -88.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TNA?
IVV and TNA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TNA?
IVV yields 1.06% while TNA yields 0.31%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TNA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, TNA over 1Y and 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.