IVV vs TSLQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TSLQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.17% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $99M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 7.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +1.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | -56.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | -65.62% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 88.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -98.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Tradr ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 13, 2022 |
IVV vs TSLQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while TSLQ returned -56.28%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 1.94% for TSLQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against -65.62% for TSLQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -57.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -98.7% for TSLQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSLQ charges 1.17%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $117 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 7.08% for TSLQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TSLQ share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TSLQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSLQ charges 1.17%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TSLQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs -56.28% for TSLQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -57.49% for TSLQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TSLQ?
TSLQ has been the more volatile fund at 88.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TSLQ -98.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and TSLQ?
IVV and TSLQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TSLQ?
IVV and TSLQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSLQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while TSLQ yields 7.08%, so TSLQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.