IVV vs TSLT

IVV vs TSLT

Which is better, IVV or TSLT?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTSLT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best1.05%
AUM$876.4B$166M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50811
YTD Return+12.39%Best-47.14%
1Y Return+16.61%Best-47.51%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best-13.57%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)12.4%Best106.0%
Max Drawdown-18.8%Best-83.2%
$10,000 over 2.9 years$18,495Best$6,551
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)REX Shares
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 19, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 19, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.9 years).

IVV vs TSLT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.

IVV vs TSLT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TSLT returned -47.51%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 47.14% for TSLT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against -13.57% for TSLT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TSLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 106.0% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -83.2% for TSLT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TSLT charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TSLT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and TSLT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVTSLT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TSLT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TSLT charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or TSLT?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -47.51% for TSLT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or TSLT?

TSLT has been the more volatile fund at 106.0% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TSLT -83.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and TSLT?

IVV and TSLT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TSLT?

IVV yields 1.06% while TSLT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TSLT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.