IVV vs TYLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.74% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +0.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +2.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 0.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -8.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cambria Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 4, 2024 |
IVV vs TYLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while TYLD returned +2.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 0.87% for TYLD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 0.8% for TYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -8.2% for TYLD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TYLD charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.74% for TYLD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TYLD share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TYLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TYLD charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TYLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +2.55% for TYLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +0.48% for TYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TYLD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 0.8% for TYLD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TYLD -8.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TYLD?
IVV and TYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TYLD?
IVV and TYLD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TYLD?
IVV yields 1.09% while TYLD yields 3.74%, so TYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.