IVV vs UCOP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Ultra Copper K-1 Free ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UCOP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $5M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.12% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +5.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 20, 2026 |
IVV vs UCOP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra Copper K-1 Free ETF (UCOP) is a ETF from ProShares. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 5.73% for UCOP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.8% for UCOP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UCOP charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.12% for UCOP.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UCOP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UCOP charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UCOP?
IVV yields 1.10% while UCOP yields 0.12%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.