IVV vs UOCT

IVV vs UOCT

Which is better, IVV or UOCT?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVUOCT
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$179M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50812
YTD Return+12.39%Best+7.98%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+10.32%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%Best+11.56%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%Best+8.71%
Volatility (annualized)16.7%6.7%Best
Max Drawdown-33.9%-13.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,844Best$15,183
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 28, 2018

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8 years).

IVV vs UOCT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.

IVV vs UOCT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - October (UOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while UOCT returned +10.32%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 7.98% for UOCT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +11.56% for UOCT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.51% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.89% annualized vs +7.34%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 6.7% for UOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -13.7% for UOCT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while UOCT charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for UOCT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and UOCT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVUOCT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or UOCT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UOCT charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or UOCT?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +10.32% for UOCT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.89% vs +7.34% for UOCT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or UOCT?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 6.7% for UOCT. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs UOCT -13.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and UOCT?

IVV and UOCT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UOCT?

IVV yields 1.06% while UOCT yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is UOCT better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.