IVV vs URAN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | URAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $32M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.92% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 48 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | -11.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +9.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 39.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -35.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Themes ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2024 |
IVV vs URAN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) is a ETF from Themes ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while URAN returned +9.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a loss of 11.75% for URAN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.2% for URAN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while URAN charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.92% for URAN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and URAN share 1 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in URAN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPGP | 0.62% | 1.53% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or URAN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while URAN charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or URAN?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +9.99% for URAN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +22.11% for URAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or URAN?
URAN has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs URAN -35.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and URAN?
IVV and URAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and URAN?
IVV and URAN share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or URAN?
IVV yields 1.10% while URAN yields 2.92%, so URAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.