IVV vs UUP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UUP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $430M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.26% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +3.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +6.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +2.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +4.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 20, 2007 |
IVV vs UUP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while UUP returned +6.02%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 3.54% for UUP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +2.79% for UUP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +4.52% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for UUP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.2% for UUP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UUP charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.26% for UUP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and UUP share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UUP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UUP charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UUP?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +6.02% for UUP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +1.36% for UUP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UUP?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for UUP. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UUP -22.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and UUP?
IVV and UUP have a monthly-return correlation of -0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UUP?
IVV and UUP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UUP?
IVV yields 1.09% while UUP yields 3.26%, so UUP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.