IVV vs UXOC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. UXOC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UXOC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $21M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +14.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +22.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 18, 2024 |
IVV vs UXOC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while UXOC returned +22.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 14.93% for UXOC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for UXOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.9% for UXOC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UXOC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for UXOC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and UXOC share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UXOC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UXOC charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UXOC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +22.09% for UXOC, so UXOC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +17.98% for UXOC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UXOC?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for UXOC. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UXOC -19.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and UXOC?
IVV and UXOC have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UXOC?
IVV and UXOC share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UXOC?
IVV yields 1.09% while UXOC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.