IVV vs VBNB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck BNB ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VBNB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 0 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | -4.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 7, 2026 |
IVV vs VBNB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck BNB ETF (VBNB) is a ETF from VanEck. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a loss of 4.96% for VBNB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.6% for VBNB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VBNB charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for VBNB.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VBNB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VBNB charges 0.39%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VBNB?
IVV yields 1.09% while VBNB yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.