IVV vs WARP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Space ETF
Which is better, IVV or WARP?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WARP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 22 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -19.51% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 75.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 6, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs WARP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs WARP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 19.51% for WARP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WARP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for WARP.
Holdings Overlap
4.9% of WARP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
WARP and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in WARP, against full books of 508 and 22.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for WARP that do not appear in our book for IVV (75.4% of the fund), and 481 for IVV that do not appear in WARP (98.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WARP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 0.02% | 4.92% | 4.90% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and WARP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WARP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WARP charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WARP?
4.9% of WARP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.9% of WARP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 21 in WARP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WARP?
IVV yields 1.06% while WARP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WARP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.