IVV vs WDTE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WDTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.03% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $66M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 51.34% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +12.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +19.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +14.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 18, 2023 |
IVV vs WDTE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF (WDTE) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while WDTE returned +19.39%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 12.73% for WDTE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +14.78% for WDTE. Across the full 3-year window we track, WDTE has the edge at +14.78% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.5% for WDTE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.8% for WDTE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WDTE charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $103 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 51.34% for WDTE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WDTE share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WDTE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDTE charges 1.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WDTE?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +19.39% for WDTE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +14.78% for WDTE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WDTE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.5% for WDTE. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WDTE -15.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and WDTE?
IVV and WDTE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WDTE?
IVV and WDTE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WDTE?
IVV yields 1.09% while WDTE yields 51.34%, so WDTE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.