IVV vs WTMY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal Fund ETF
Which is better, IVV or WTMY?
Large Cap Blend against Municipal Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTMY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.77% |
| Holdings | 508 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -1.35% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -0.67% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 4.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -3.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $14,566Best | $10,320 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Municipal Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 3, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).
IVV vs WTMY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WTMY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree High Income Laddered Municipal Fund ETF (WTMY) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while WTMY returned -0.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 1.35% for WTMY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 4.3% for WTMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -3.7% for WTMY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTMY charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.77% for WTMY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and WTMY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTMY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTMY charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WTMY?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -0.67% for WTMY, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +28.50% vs +2.12% for WTMY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WTMY?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 4.3% for WTMY. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs WTMY -3.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and WTMY?
IVV and WTMY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTMY?
IVV yields 1.06% while WTMY yields 3.77%, so WTMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTMY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.