IVV vs WTPI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTPI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.44% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $491M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 12.25% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +6.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +15.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +13.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +9.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -32.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 24, 2016 |
IVV vs WTPI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund (WTPI) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while WTPI returned +15.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 6.56% for WTPI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +13.58% for WTPI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +9.59% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, WTPI has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.7% for WTPI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -32.3% for WTPI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTPI charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $44 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 12.25% for WTPI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WTPI share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTPI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTPI charges 0.44%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WTPI?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +15.81% for WTPI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.05% for WTPI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WTPI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.7% for WTPI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WTPI -32.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and WTPI?
IVV and WTPI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WTPI?
IVV and WTPI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTPI?
IVV yields 1.09% while WTPI yields 12.25%, so WTPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.