IVV vs XHYD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs BondBloxx USD High Yield Bond Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
Which is better, IVV or XHYD?
Large Cap Blend against Long Term High Quality.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XHYD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 5.76% |
| Holdings | 508 | 175 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 7.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -11.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $17,874Best | $12,152 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | BondBloxx |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Long Term High Quality |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 15, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 130 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IVV has data through Sep 22, 2026 and XHYD through May 15, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 17, 2022 to May 15, 2026 (4.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 7.4% for XHYD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -11.0% for XHYD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XHYD charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 5.76% for XHYD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 152 in XHYD, totalling 99.3% and 84.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 213 days apart, IVV as of Aug 31, 2026 and XHYD as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 152 in XHYD, against full books of 508 and 175.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XHYD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XHYD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XHYD charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IVV or XHYD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 7.4% for XHYD. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs XHYD -11.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and XHYD?
IVV and XHYD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XHYD?
IVV yields 1.06% while XHYD yields 5.76%, so XHYD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XHYD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.