IVV vs XIMR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March
Which is better, IVV or XIMR?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XIMR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $30M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 6.59% |
| Holdings | 508 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +0.90% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +2.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 2.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -5.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $15,177Best | $11,316 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 19, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.5 years).
IVV vs XIMR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XIMR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FT Vest US Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while XIMR returned +2.06%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 0.90% for XIMR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 2.3% for XIMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -5.1% for XIMR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XIMR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 6.59% for XIMR.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XIMR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XIMR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XIMR charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XIMR?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +2.06% for XIMR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XIMR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 2.3% for XIMR. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs XIMR -5.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and XIMR?
IVV and XIMR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XIMR?
IVV yields 1.06% while XIMR yields 6.59%, so XIMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XIMR better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.