IVV vs XTWO
IVV vs XTWO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XTWO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $206M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 97 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +0.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +2.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +4.11% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | BondBloxx | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 13, 2022 |
IVV vs XTWO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) is a ETF from BondBloxx. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while XTWO returned +2.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 0.60% for XTWO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +4.11% for XTWO. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.9% for XTWO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.7% for XTWO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.22. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XTWO charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.07% for XTWO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XTWO share 0 holdings out of 582 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XTWO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XTWO charges 0.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XTWO?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +2.46% for XTWO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +3.60% for XTWO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XTWO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.9% for XTWO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XTWO -1.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and XTWO?
IVV and XTWO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.22, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XTWO?
IVV and XTWO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XTWO?
IVV yields 1.09% while XTWO yields 4.07%, so XTWO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.