IVV vs ZCBG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ZCBG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.07% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $969,200 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.14% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | -1.36% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -5.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 6, 2026 |
IVV vs ZCBG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF (ZCBG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a loss of 1.36% for ZCBG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -5.1% for ZCBG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ZCBG charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $7 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.14% for ZCBG.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ZCBG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZCBG charges 0.07%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ZCBG?
IVV yields 1.10% while ZCBG yields 2.14%, so ZCBG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.