IWMY vs VTI
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWMY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $98M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 41.94% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.37% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.94% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
IWMY vs VTI Performance
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWMY returned +17.94% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IWMY is up 14.37% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.8% for IWMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for IWMY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWMY charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWMY currently yields 41.94% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IWMY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWMY or VTI?
IWMY has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IWMY or VTI?
Over the past year IWMY returned +17.94% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IWMY annualized -0.27% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IWMY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.8% for IWMY. Worst drawdown: IWMY -35.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IWMY and VTI?
IWMY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IWMY and VTI?
IWMY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWMY or VTI?
IWMY yields 41.94% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IWMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.