IZRL vs PHDG
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. PHDG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 494 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IZRL | PHDG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $142M | $61M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.55% | 1.68% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 514 | |
| YTD Return | +0.27% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.14% | +16.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.81% | +9.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.21% | +4.73% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 9.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.0% | -23.6% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2017 | Dec 5, 2012 |
IZRL vs PHDG Performance
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IZRL returned +11.14% while PHDG returned +16.59%. Year to date, IZRL is up 0.27% versus a gain of 13.13% for PHDG.
Over three years, IZRL compounded at +15.81% per year against +9.80% for PHDG; over five years the annualized figures are +0.21% and +4.73% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.51% annualized vs +4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 9.9% for PHDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.0% for IZRL and -23.6% for PHDG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IZRL charges 0.49% per year while PHDG charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $39 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IZRL currently yields 2.55% against 1.68% for PHDG.
Holdings Overlap
IZRL and PHDG share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IZRL or PHDG?
IZRL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while PHDG charges 0.39%. PHDG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IZRL or PHDG?
Over the past year IZRL returned +11.14% vs +16.59% for PHDG, so PHDG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IZRL annualized +5.51% vs +4.45% for PHDG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IZRL or PHDG?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 9.9% for PHDG. Worst drawdown: IZRL -60.0% vs PHDG -23.6%.
Should I hold both IZRL and PHDG?
IZRL and PHDG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IZRL and PHDG?
IZRL and PHDG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IZRL or PHDG?
IZRL yields 2.55% while PHDG yields 1.68%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.