IZRL vs QQQ
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IZRL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $137M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.63% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 67 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -4.16% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.19% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.16% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.04% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IZRL vs QQQ Performance
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IZRL returned +8.19% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, IZRL is down 4.16% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, IZRL compounded at +15.16% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.04% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.5% for IZRL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.0% for IZRL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IZRL charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IZRL currently yields 2.63% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IZRL and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 168 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IZRL or QQQ?
IZRL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IZRL or QQQ?
Over the past year IZRL returned +8.19% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IZRL annualized +4.95% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IZRL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.5% for IZRL. Worst drawdown: IZRL -60.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IZRL and QQQ?
IZRL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IZRL and QQQ?
IZRL and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 168 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IZRL or QQQ?
IZRL yields 2.63% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.