IZRL vs SAWS
IZRL vs SAWS
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. SAWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IZRL | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $142M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.55% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | -0.27% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.01% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.44% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.04% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.5% | 18.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.0% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2017 | Jul 30, 2024 |
IZRL vs SAWS Performance
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year IZRL returned +13.01% while SAWS returned +25.78%. Year to date, IZRL is down 0.27% versus a gain of 16.18% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 18.3% for SAWS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.0% for IZRL and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IZRL charges 0.49% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $55 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IZRL currently yields 2.55% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
IZRL and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 137 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IZRL or SAWS?
IZRL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SAWS charges 0.55%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IZRL or SAWS?
Over the past year IZRL returned +13.01% vs +25.78% for SAWS, so SAWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IZRL annualized +5.46% vs +13.57% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IZRL or SAWS?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 18.3% for SAWS. Worst drawdown: IZRL -60.0% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both IZRL and SAWS?
IZRL and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IZRL and SAWS?
IZRL and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 137 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IZRL or SAWS?
IZRL yields 2.55% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.