JMHI vs QQQ
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. JMHI offers more diversification with 236 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JMHI | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $293M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.56% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 236 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.23% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.28% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.44% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JMHI vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JMHI returned +5.28% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, JMHI is up 1.23% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, JMHI compounded at +5.44% per year against +25.47% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.7% for JMHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.1% for JMHI and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JMHI charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JMHI currently yields 4.56% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JMHI and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 130 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JMHI or QQQ?
JMHI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JMHI or QQQ?
Over the past year JMHI returned +5.28% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), JMHI annualized +4.27% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JMHI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.7% for JMHI. Worst drawdown: JMHI -7.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JMHI and QQQ?
JMHI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JMHI and QQQ?
JMHI and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JMHI or QQQ?
JMHI yields 4.56% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JMHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.