KEMX vs SCHD
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, KEMX or SCHD?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KEMX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KEMX is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEMX | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $134M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 295 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +38.39%Best | +27.56% |
| 1Y Return | +65.56%Best | +30.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.29%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.64%Best | +10.23% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.8% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,952Best | $16,274 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 12, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.4 years).
KEMX vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
KEMX vs SCHD Performance
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) is an ETF from KraneShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KEMX returned +65.56% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, KEMX is up 38.39% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, KEMX compounded at +29.29% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.64% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, KEMX has the edge at +13.68% annualized vs +12.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 16.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.8% for KEMX and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEMX charges 0.24% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $6 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEMX currently yields 2.66% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 282 holdings in KEMX and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.3% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 282 positions we hold weights for in KEMX and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 295 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for KEMX (99.9% of the fund), and 5 for KEMX that do not appear in SCHD (1.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KEMX and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEMX or SCHD?
KEMX has an expense ratio of 0.24% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KEMX or SCHD?
Over the past year KEMX returned +65.56% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so KEMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), KEMX annualized +13.68% vs +12.32% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KEMX or SCHD?
KEMX has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 16.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KEMX -38.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KEMX and SCHD?
KEMX and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEMX or SCHD?
KEMX yields 2.66% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than KEMX?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KEMX led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KEMX is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.