KEUA vs VYM
KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, KEUA or VYM?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEUA | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.82% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 7 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.8% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.2% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $10,325 | $15,973Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 175 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KEUA has data through Mar 13, 2026 and VYM through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2021 to Mar 13, 2026 (4.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEUA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.8% compared with 14.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.2% for KEUA and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEUA charges 0.87% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $4 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEUA currently yields 2.82% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in KEUA and 602 in VYM, totalling 101.1% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 151 days apart, KEUA as of Jan 30, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in KEUA and 602 in VYM, against full books of 7 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KEUA and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEUA or VYM?
KEUA has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KEUA or VYM?
KEUA has been the more volatile fund at 33.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KEUA -49.2% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both KEUA and VYM?
KEUA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEUA or VYM?
KEUA yields 2.82% while VYM yields 2.24%, so KEUA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than KEUA?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.