KF vs TYLG
The Korea Fund, Inc. vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
KF delivered stronger 1-year returns. TYLG offers more diversification with 78 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KF | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $316M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.02% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +67.47% | +20.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +145.73% | +34.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.81% | +23.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.69% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.4% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.0% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Aug 29, 1984 | Nov 21, 2022 |
KF vs TYLG Performance
The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a ETF from The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year KF returned +145.73% while TYLG returned +34.81%. Year to date, KF is up 67.47% versus a gain of 20.94% for TYLG.
Over three years, KF compounded at +46.81% per year against +23.52% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.07% annualized vs +16.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.4% compared with 15.8% for TYLG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.0% for KF and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
KF and TYLG share 0 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, KF or TYLG?
Over the past year KF returned +145.73% vs +34.81% for TYLG, so KF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), KF annualized +16.54% vs +25.07% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KF or TYLG?
KF has been the more volatile fund at 43.4% annualized versus 15.8% for TYLG. Worst drawdown: KF -77.0% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both KF and TYLG?
KF and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KF and TYLG?
KF and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KF or TYLG?
KF yields 2.02% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.