KJUL vs VTI
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KJUL or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJUL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $229M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +5.26% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.59% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.99% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3%Best | 15.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,757 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2020 to Sep 11, 2026 (6.2 years).
KJUL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
KJUL vs VTI Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KJUL returned +8.59% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, KJUL is up 5.26% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, KJUL compounded at +9.38% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.99% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.53% annualized vs +6.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 10.3% for KJUL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for KJUL and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJUL charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KJUL currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJUL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJUL or VTI?
KJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KJUL or VTI?
Over the past year KJUL returned +8.59% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), KJUL annualized +6.15% vs +16.53% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KJUL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 10.3% for KJUL. Worst drawdown: KJUL -16.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both KJUL and VTI?
KJUL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJUL or VTI?
KJUL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KJUL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.