KMAY vs VTI
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - May vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMAY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $51M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.69% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.99% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
KMAY vs VTI Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - May (KMAY) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KMAY returned +13.99% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, KMAY is up 8.69% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 3.4% for KMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.4% for KMAY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMAY charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMAY or VTI?
KMAY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KMAY or VTI?
Over the past year KMAY returned +13.99% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KMAY annualized +18.27% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KMAY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 3.4% for KMAY. Worst drawdown: KMAY -2.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KMAY and VTI?
KMAY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMAY or VTI?
KMAY yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.