KMF vs SCHD
Kayne Anderson NextGen Energy & Infrastructure Inc vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMF | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.20% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $501M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.00% | +25.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.00% | +30.41% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.81% | +16.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.17% | +9.64% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 33.2% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2010 | Oct 20, 2011 |
KMF vs SCHD Performance
Kayne Anderson NextGen Energy & Infrastructure Inc (KMF) is a ETF from Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KMF returned +0.00% while SCHD returned +30.41%. Year to date, KMF is up 0.00% versus a gain of 25.69% for SCHD.
Over three years, KMF compounded at +4.81% per year against +16.03% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +5.17% and +9.64% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs -0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KMF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.3% for KMF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMF charges 3.20% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $320 vs $6 annually, a gap of $314 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMF currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMF or SCHD?
KMF has an expense ratio of 3.20% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $314 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KMF or SCHD?
Over the past year KMF returned +0.00% vs +30.41% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), KMF annualized -0.39% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KMF or SCHD?
KMF has been the more volatile fund at 33.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KMF -94.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KMF and SCHD?
KMF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KMF and SCHD?
KMF and SCHD share 2 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 129 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMF or SCHD?
KMF yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.