KMLI vs VTI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KMLI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 14.47% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -22.34% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -50.47% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
KMLI vs VTI Performance
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KMLI returned -50.47% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, KMLI is down 22.34% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KMLI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.2% for KMLI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KMLI charges 1.26% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $126 vs $3 annually, a gap of $123 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMLI currently yields 14.47% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KMLI and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KMLI or VTI?
KMLI has an expense ratio of 1.26% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $123 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KMLI or VTI?
Over the past year KMLI returned -50.47% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KMLI annualized -47.70% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KMLI or VTI?
KMLI has been the more volatile fund at 50.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KMLI -73.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KMLI and VTI?
KMLI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KMLI and VTI?
KMLI and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KMLI or VTI?
KMLI yields 14.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KMLI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.