KOCT vs VYM
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOCT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $129M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +11.87% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.16% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.87% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.12% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
KOCT vs VYM Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - October (KOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOCT returned +23.16% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, KOCT is up 11.87% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, KOCT compounded at +10.87% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.12% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.6% for KOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for KOCT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOCT charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOCT currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOCT or VYM?
KOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KOCT or VYM?
Over the past year KOCT returned +23.16% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), KOCT annualized +6.88% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KOCT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.6% for KOCT. Worst drawdown: KOCT -28.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both KOCT and VYM?
KOCT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOCT or VYM?
KOCT yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.