KPDD vs VTI
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KPDD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 112.50% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -48.94% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -54.50% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
KPDD vs VTI Performance
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (KPDD) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KPDD returned -54.50% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, KPDD is down 48.94% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KPDD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.5% for KPDD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KPDD charges 1.26% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $126 vs $3 annually, a gap of $123 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KPDD currently yields 112.50% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KPDD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KPDD or VTI?
KPDD has an expense ratio of 1.26% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $123 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KPDD or VTI?
Over the past year KPDD returned -54.50% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KPDD annualized -47.52% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KPDD or VTI?
KPDD has been the more volatile fund at 64.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KPDD -77.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KPDD and VTI?
KPDD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KPDD and VTI?
KPDD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KPDD or VTI?
KPDD yields 112.50% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KPDD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.