KPRO vs VTI
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KPRO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -5.57% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -6.61% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 7, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
KPRO vs VTI Performance
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is a ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KPRO returned -6.61% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, KPRO is down 5.57% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.1% for KPRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for KPRO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KPRO charges 1.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $3 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KPRO currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KPRO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KPRO or VTI?
KPRO has an expense ratio of 1.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KPRO or VTI?
Over the past year KPRO returned -6.61% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), KPRO annualized +3.54% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KPRO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.1% for KPRO. Worst drawdown: KPRO -15.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KPRO and VTI?
KPRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KPRO and VTI?
KPRO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KPRO or VTI?
KPRO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.