LMBO vs VYM
Direxion Daily Crypto Industry Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, LMBO or VYM?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LMBO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.09% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 31 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 73.3% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $8,051 | $12,753Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 17, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 153 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. LMBO has data through Apr 10, 2026 and VYM through Sep 10, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.7 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LMBO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.3% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.6% for LMBO and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LMBO charges 0.98% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $4 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LMBO currently yields 6.09% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 29 holdings in LMBO and 603 in VYM, totalling 105.9% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 151 days apart, LMBO as of Jan 30, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in LMBO and 603 in VYM, against full books of 31 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LMBO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LMBO or VYM?
LMBO has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, LMBO or VYM?
LMBO has been the more volatile fund at 73.3% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LMBO -67.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both LMBO and VYM?
LMBO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LMBO or VYM?
LMBO yields 6.09% while VYM yields 2.22%, so LMBO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than LMBO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.