LPSV vs SCHD
Lone Peak SMID Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, LPSV or SCHD?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LPSV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $477,462.13 | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 25 | 206 |
| YTD Return | -3.08% | +28.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +32.53% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.83% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.3% | 41.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Lone Peak Global Investors, LLC | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
LPSV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LPSV vs SCHD Performance
Lone Peak SMID Value ETF (LPSV) is an ETF from Lone Peak Global Investors, LLC and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, LPSV is down 3.08% versus a gain of 28.06% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LPSV charges 0.70% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $6 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LPSV currently yields 0.00% against 3.24% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
6.5% of LPSV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.3% of SCHD's money is in holdings LPSV also owns.
LPSV and SCHD share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in LPSV and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 25 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 25 and 98 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 95 positions LPSV does not, 99.4% of the fund.
Largest: TXN 4.89%, QCOM 4.61%, PG 4.16%, CVX 4.14%, KO 4.12%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LPSV and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LPSV or SCHD?
LPSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LPSV and SCHD?
6.5% of LPSV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.3% of SCHD's is in holdings LPSV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in LPSV and 98 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, LPSV or SCHD?
LPSV yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than LPSV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.