MARO vs QQQY
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF vs Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Which is better, MARO or QQQY?
QQQY has been ahead.
MARO has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MARO | QQQY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $26M | $169M |
| Dividend Yield | 250.93% | 35.29% |
| Holdings | 24 | 9 |
| YTD Return | -36.08% | +9.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | -55.48% | +11.02%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 55.7% | 18.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.3% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $2,879 | $12,072Best |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Dec 9, 2024 | Sep 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.9 years).
MARO vs QQQY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
MARO vs QQQY Performance
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF (QQQY) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year MARO returned -55.48% while QQQY returned +11.02%. Year to date, MARO is down 36.08% versus a gain of 9.70% for QQQY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MARO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.7% compared with 18.1% for QQQY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.3% for MARO and -19.1% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MARO charges 1.00% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $101 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MARO currently yields 250.93% against 35.29% for QQQY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in MARO and 1 in QQQY, totalling 39.5% and 1.4% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in MARO and 1 in QQQY, against full books of 24 and 9.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MARO | Weight in QQQY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 5.77% | 1.42% | 4.35% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MARO and QQQY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MARO or QQQY?
MARO has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQY charges 1.01%. MARO is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MARO or QQQY?
Over the past year MARO returned -55.48% vs +11.02% for QQQY, so QQQY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MARO annualized -48.07% vs +10.42% for QQQY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MARO or QQQY?
MARO has been the more volatile fund at 55.7% annualized versus 18.1% for QQQY. Worst drawdown: MARO -79.3% vs QQQY -19.1%.
Should I hold both MARO and QQQY?
MARO and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MARO or QQQY?
MARO yields 250.93% while QQQY yields 35.29%, so MARO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQY better than MARO?
MARO has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.