MBS vs VYM

MBS vs VYM

Which is better, MBS or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMBSVYM
Expense Ratio0.49%0.04%Best
AUM$153M$81.6B
Dividend Yield5.60%2.22%
Holdings133613
YTD Return-0.74%+11.71%Best
1Y Return+1.04%+16.24%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.24%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Volatility (annualized)4.6%Best10.6%
Max Drawdown-4.1%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$11,364$15,051Best
Fund FamilyAngel Oak Capital AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionFeb 20, 2024Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 20, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (2.6 years).

MBS vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

MBS vs VYM Performance

Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) is an ETF from Angel Oak Capital Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MBS returned +1.04% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, MBS is down 0.74% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.6% compared with 4.6% for MBS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.1% for MBS and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MBS charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBS currently yields 5.60% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 19 holdings in MBS and 557 in VYM, totalling 26.9% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in MBS and 557 in VYM, against full books of 133 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MBS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MBSVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MBS or VYM?

MBS has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MBS or VYM?

Over the past year MBS returned +1.04% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MBS or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.6% annualized versus 4.6% for MBS. Worst drawdown: MBS -4.1% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both MBS and VYM?

MBS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MBS or VYM?

MBS yields 5.60% while VYM yields 2.22%, so MBS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than MBS?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.