MCVT vs QQQ
Miller Convertible Total Return ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MCVT or QQQ?
Convertibles against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCVT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 46 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +9.44% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Fund Family | The Miller Family Of Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Convertible | Equity |
| Style | Convertibles | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 24, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
MCVT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MCVT vs QQQ Performance
Miller Convertible Total Return ETF (MCVT) is an ETF from The Miller Family Of Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, MCVT is up 9.44% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCVT charges 0.85% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $18 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCVT currently yields 0.03% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 15 holdings in MCVT and 102 in QQQ, totalling 33.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in MCVT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 46 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MCVT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCVT or QQQ?
MCVT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCVT or QQQ?
MCVT yields 0.03% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MCVT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.