MFM vs QQQ
MFS Municipal Income Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MFM or QQQ?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.45% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $250M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.66% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 840 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +0.26% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.06% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.44% | +24.98%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.58% | +14.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5%Best | 30.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5%Best | -83.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,235 | $19,586Best |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 25, 1986 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 1999 to Sep 11, 2026 (27.5 years).
MFM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MFM vs QQQ Performance
MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MFM returned +2.06% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, MFM is up 0.26% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Over three years, MFM compounded at +7.44% per year against +24.98% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.58% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs -0.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for MFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for MFM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFM charges 1.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $145 vs $18 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFM currently yields 5.66% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 263 holdings in MFM and 102 in QQQ, totalling 55.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, MFM as of Jan 31, 2026 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 263 positions we hold weights for in MFM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 840 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MFM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFM or QQQ?
MFM has an expense ratio of 1.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFM or QQQ?
Over the past year MFM returned +2.06% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), MFM annualized -0.88% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for MFM. Worst drawdown: MFM -59.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MFM and QQQ?
MFM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFM or QQQ?
MFM yields 5.66% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MFM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MFM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.