MGF vs VYM
Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, MGF or VYM?
Long Term High Quality against Large Cap Value.
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.04% |
| AUM | $99M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.74% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 465 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -3.33% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.74% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.53% | +18.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.66% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,197 | $17,758Best |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Long Term High Quality | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 28, 1987 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.8 years).
MGF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
MGF vs VYM Performance
Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund (MGF) is an ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGF returned -3.74% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, MGF is down 3.33% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, MGF compounded at +3.53% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -1.66% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.95% annualized vs -2.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 9.1% for MGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for MGF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 176 holdings in MGF and 603 in VYM, totalling 68.3% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 176 positions we hold weights for in MGF and 603 in VYM, against full books of 465 and 613.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MGF and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MGF or VYM?
Over the past year MGF returned -3.74% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), MGF annualized -2.11% vs +6.95% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MGF or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 9.1% for MGF. Worst drawdown: MGF -55.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MGF and VYM?
MGF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGF or VYM?
MGF yields 7.74% while VYM yields 2.22%, so MGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than MGF?
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.