MRAL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MRAL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $45M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -50.20% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -85.45% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 132.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -93.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 7, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
MRAL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MRAL returned -85.45% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, MRAL is down 50.20% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MRAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 132.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.5% for MRAL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MRAL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MRAL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MRAL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MRAL or VTI?
MRAL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MRAL or VTI?
Over the past year MRAL returned -85.45% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MRAL annualized -80.31% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MRAL or VTI?
MRAL has been the more volatile fund at 132.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MRAL -93.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MRAL and VTI?
MRAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MRAL and VTI?
MRAL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MRAL or VTI?
MRAL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.