MSFD vs VTI
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.97% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.03% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.29% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
MSFD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF (MSFD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFD returned -0.03% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, MSFD is down 7.97% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, MSFD compounded at -13.29% per year against +21.93% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs -16.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.9% for MSFD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFD currently yields 4.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSFD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFD or VTI?
MSFD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFD or VTI?
Over the past year MSFD returned -0.03% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), MSFD annualized -16.12% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFD or VTI?
MSFD has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSFD -59.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSFD and VTI?
MSFD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFD and VTI?
MSFD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFD or VTI?
MSFD yields 4.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MSFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.