MSTB vs VTI
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MSTB or VTI?
Tactical Allocation against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $196M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.56% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.87% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.51% | +20.62%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.46% | +11.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,330 | $17,373Best |
| Fund Family | Little Harbor Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Tactical Allocation | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2020 to Sep 9, 2026 (5.9 years).
MSTB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
MSTB vs VTI Performance
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) is an ETF from Little Harbor Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTB returned +12.87% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, MSTB is up 9.56% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Over three years, MSTB compounded at +17.51% per year against +20.62% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.46% and +11.68% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +15.72% annualized vs +10.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.1% for MSTB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for MSTB and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTB charges 1.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $138 vs $3 annually, a gap of $135 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTB currently yields 0.37% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in MSTB and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 89.7% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 52 days apart, MSTB as of Aug 21, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in MSTB and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MSTB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTB or VTI?
MSTB has an expense ratio of 1.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $135 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MSTB or VTI?
Over the past year MSTB returned +12.87% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MSTB annualized +10.93% vs +15.72% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MSTB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.1% for MSTB. Worst drawdown: MSTB -25.6% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both MSTB and VTI?
MSTB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTB or VTI?
MSTB yields 0.37% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MSTB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.