MSTP vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -71.07% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -95.15% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 124.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
MSTP vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF (MSTP) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTP returned -95.15% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, MSTP is down 71.07% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 124.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.4% for MSTP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTP charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MSTP and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MSTP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSTR | 66.66% | 0.04% | 66.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTP or VTI?
MSTP has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTP or VTI?
Over the past year MSTP returned -95.15% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MSTP annualized -94.10% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTP or VTI?
MSTP has been the more volatile fund at 124.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MSTP -98.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MSTP and VTI?
MSTP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTP and VTI?
MSTP and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTP or VTI?
MSTP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.