MULL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MULL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MULL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $509M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +318.13% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +2076.87% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 224.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MULL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MULL returned +2076.87% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MULL is up 318.13% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MULL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 224.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.3% for MULL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MULL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MULL currently yields 0.04% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MULL and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MULL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUVL | 66.67% | 0.00% | 66.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MULL or VTI?
MULL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $147 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MULL or VTI?
Over the past year MULL returned +2076.87% vs +23.31% for VTI, so MULL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MULL annualized +455.92% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MULL or VTI?
MULL has been the more volatile fund at 224.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MULL -72.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MULL and VTI?
MULL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MULL and VTI?
MULL and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MULL or VTI?
MULL yields 0.04% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.