MULL vs VTI

MULL vs VTI

Which is better, MULL or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MULL led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: MULL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMULLVTI
Expense Ratio1.50%0.03%Best
AUM$608M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.08%1.03%
Holdings23,543
YTD Return+402.35%Best+12.28%
1Y Return+1528.88%Best+16.78%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.89%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.94%
Volatility (annualized)219.8%12.9%Best
Max Drawdown-72.3%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.8 years$221,384Best$12,856
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 11, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 12, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.8 years).

MULL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

MULL vs VTI Performance

GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MULL returned +1528.88% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, MULL is up 402.35% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MULL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 219.8% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.3% for MULL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MULL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MULL currently yields 0.08% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MULL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MULLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MULL or VTI?

MULL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MULL or VTI?

Over the past year MULL returned +1528.88% vs +16.78% for VTI, so MULL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MULL annualized +458.86% vs +14.98% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MULL or VTI?

MULL has been the more volatile fund at 219.8% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MULL -72.3% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both MULL and VTI?

MULL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MULL or VTI?

MULL yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MULL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MULL led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.