MUST vs QQQ
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, MUST or QQQ?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUST | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $591M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 645 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -3.25% | +15.18%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.45% | +19.65%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.36% | +24.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.31% | +13.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.1%Best | 20.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,846 | $19,204Best |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2018 to Sep 15, 2026 (7.9 years).
MUST vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MUST vs QQQ Performance
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MUST returned -1.45% while QQQ returned +19.65%. Year to date, MUST is down 3.25% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.
Over three years, MUST compounded at +2.36% per year against +24.60% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.31% and +13.94% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.97% annualized vs +1.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 6.1% for MUST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for MUST and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUST charges 0.23% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $18 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUST currently yields 3.43% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 378 holdings in MUST and 102 in QQQ, totalling 49.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 378 positions we hold weights for in MUST and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 645 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MUST and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUST or QQQ?
MUST has an expense ratio of 0.23% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MUST or QQQ?
Over the past year MUST returned -1.45% vs +19.65% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), MUST annualized +1.52% vs +19.97% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MUST or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 6.1% for MUST. Worst drawdown: MUST -13.8% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both MUST and QQQ?
MUST and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUST or QQQ?
MUST yields 3.43% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so MUST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than MUST?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.