MXF vs VTI

MXF vs VTI

Which is better, MXF or VTI?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MXF led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMXFVTI
Expense Ratio1.32%0.03%Best
AUM$351M$666.9B
Dividend Yield5.27%1.03%
Holdings283,543
YTD Return+11.80%Best+11.65%
1Y Return+23.99%Best+17.34%
3Y Return (annualized)+14.08%+20.35%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.96%Best+11.72%
Volatility (annualized)25.3%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-84.7%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$17,592Best$17,404
Fund FamilyThe Mexico Fund, Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 3, 1981May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).

MXF vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.

MXF vs VTI Performance

The Mexico Fund Inc (MXF) is an ETF from The Mexico Fund, Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MXF returned +23.99% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, MXF is up 11.80% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, MXF compounded at +14.08% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.96% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +1.56%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.7% for MXF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MXF charges 1.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MXF currently yields 5.27% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 25 holdings in MXF and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 93.7% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 150 days apart, MXF as of Jan 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in MXF and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 28 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MXF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MXFVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MXF or VTI?

MXF has an expense ratio of 1.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $129 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MXF or VTI?

Over the past year MXF returned +23.99% vs +17.34% for VTI, so MXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), MXF annualized +1.56% vs +8.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MXF or VTI?

MXF has been the more volatile fund at 25.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MXF -84.7% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MXF and VTI?

MXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MXF or VTI?

MXF yields 5.27% while VTI yields 1.03%, so MXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than MXF?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. MXF led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.