MXF vs VTI
The Mexico Fund Inc vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MXF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $351M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.29% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.44% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.43% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.48% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -84.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Mexico Fund, Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 3, 1981 | May 24, 2001 |
MXF vs VTI Performance
The Mexico Fund Inc (MXF) is a ETF from The Mexico Fund, Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MXF returned +26.43% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, MXF is up 11.44% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, MXF compounded at +13.49% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.48% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.7% for MXF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MXF charges 1.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MXF currently yields 5.29% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MXF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MXF or VTI?
MXF has an expense ratio of 1.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $129 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MXF or VTI?
Over the past year MXF returned +26.43% vs +21.39% for VTI, so MXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), MXF annualized +2.23% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MXF or VTI?
MXF has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MXF -84.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MXF and VTI?
MXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MXF and VTI?
MXF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MXF or VTI?
MXF yields 5.29% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.